Twin saga private server bot4/25/2023 ![]() It’s the crimes against humanity that break my heart, not that Trump did them and is not (yet) held accountable, but that such a mass of American population are perfectly okay with the kids left orphaned and the Kurds left to be massacred and the Muslim ban. Moreover our Republican Senators can’t seem to scrape together an ounce of personal integrity, but that’s a natural outcome of allowing an elected President serve as a dictator. More than seventy million other Americans appear voted for Trump even after he botched the COVID-19 response (and continues to do so). That you don’t bother to look that crap up demonstrates your own indifference to your civic responsibility, but that’s not unique to you, and again is an indictment of our nation.īut that’s not the only thing not unique to you. Whether you can’t think of Trump’s dictatorial maneuvers, Bobbybrownbb or you choose to ignore them, it’s terrifying either way. But that may more be an indictment of how low the US has fallen in letting Trump get elected in the first place. Oh yes, and leaving Puerto Rico without relief after Hurricane Dorian was a dick move, the kind for which usually one has to be a banana-republic dictator to pull. Then there’s the nepotism within the White House, going as far as giving his kids security clearances for which they did not qualify (and are and remain a national security risk.) That’s classic dictatorial material right there. ![]() Profiteering off of one’s position as head of state is pretty dictatorial. Then there’s the whole thing of selling access to himself to foreign powers through his hotels and clubs. ![]() But then the whole wall program was typical of an tyrant who governs based on whimsy rather than research into state affairs. It’s hazardous to presume that a person’s behavior or position defines who they are.Īs for Trump’s dictatorial policy, his declaration of a national emergency due to alleged invaders from the southern border (id est, immigrants and refugees) was pretty dictatorial, as was the re-appropriation of funds from schools for military children and for maintaining harbors in order to build his wall. Because it does.įiled Under: bans, content moderation, free speech At least for now.īut what no one should do, is think that Parler is somehow any more “pro-free speech” than Twitter is, or that it doesn’t pull down content and accounts. It’s possible to create alternatives, and Parler has shown that it’s able to attract a bunch of users. In fact, I think it’s an excellent demonstration of why the concerns about “dominance” by Twitter or other platforms is silly. So, I have nothing against Parler existing. And, personally, I’d prefer there to be many more competitors (though, I wish they were interoperable implementations of a protocol, rather than individual silos, but…). Anyway, this was always bogus, as you can see from the fact that so many accounts are being banned.Īs I’ve said before: I think competition is good. Except that later in that same article, he admits: “You can?t spam people?s comment sections with unrelated content.” Except, you kinda can do that on the “street of New York.” (I recall there being more than one street in New York, but whatever). Amusingly, the CEO is also claiming that “If you can say it on the street of New York, you can say it on Parler. And it’s pretty silly for Parler’s CEO to refer to Twitter as a “techno-fascist” company for its content moderation policies, when his company appears to be doing basically the same thing. Same with basically every other foolish person screaming about how Parler is about “free speech.” It’s got the same damn content moderation questions every platform has. What I will say is that when politicians like Ted Cruz say he’s joining Parler because it doesn’t have “censorship,” he’s wrong. And, yes, some people are claiming that Parler’s quick trigger finger is mostly about shutting down “left” leaning accounts, but as with Twitter’s content moderation, I won’t say that for sure unless I see some actual evidence to support it. But what’s not great is the site continues to pretend that it’s some “free speech alternative” to Twitter when it’s facing the same exact content moderation issues. Parler seems to be banning a bunch of people. I?ve been banned from parler ? what happened to freedom of speech /FXabyMyqqZ I was banned from Parler because I called them out on their sketchy legal tactics: shoving legal fees onto users, requiring driver's license, and abusing pornography laws. Pretty much all of my leftist friends joined Parler to screw with MAGA folks, and every last one of them was banned in less than 24 hours because conservatives truly love free speech.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |